Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Talk for Maureen's class...

1. Why did I choose to pursue this career? Where did my interest in comp/rhet come from?

My interest in composition/rhetoric happened gradually. I never set out to get a Ph.D. in comp/rhet.

Went to Iowa to get an MAT to teach h.s. English. Like a lot of students, I had no exposure to the field of composition or rhetoric as an undergraduate at UNH.
  • Bonnie's Approaches to Teaching Writing Course (freewriting; writing as thinking or write to learn; writing a paper about Dale over the course of the entire semester; reading Murray's The Craft of Revision). The idea that at Iowa, I began to learn the theory behind what so many of my writing teachers had asked me to do at UNH.
  • Working as Bonnie's research assistant (helping edit a book on teacher literacy narratives; transcribing Murray interviews for induction of his materials into the Poynter institute)
  • The Iowa Portfolio Group/Attending first conferences (UNH and NCTE, fall 1996)--a glimpse at the profession and how things work.
  • During the second year, teaching FYC at Iowa, having a "lab" where I could try out some of the things that I was learning in my coursework (freewriting, writing conferences, group workshops, portfolio assessment, etc)
After student teaching and then teaching h.s. for one year, I noticed that I was moving away from the conversation about how writing is taught and learned. I wanted to get back into that conversation and, hopefully, to contribute to it in some way. Enrolled at UNH.

2. A bit about my current work.

After teaching h.s. for one year, I tried my hand at working as an adjunct. When you need money, you'll take just about any position you can find (describe range of teaching experiences--community college, online, in corporate, and at traditional colleges/universities).

Working with adult learners at GSC as an important moment--also, watching my mother fly to Chicago to graduate with her bachelor's degree at mid-life--the confluence of these two things.

At the time of dissertation, a range of possibilities, but feeling myself pulled back to the adults withi whom I worked at NSC and reflecting on my lack of preparation for that kind of teaching (before and during grad school) and my lack of knowledge about those students themselves. I began to imagine a project--something that would have been useful for someone like me. I was my own audience--what could have helped prepare me for that work? That is the project I created and still work towards. Descriptive and qualitative. Briefly discuss project.

At the center of this work and my work, an interest in people--how they learn to write (or fail to), what they write and why, how they transition between writing contexts (like school and work).

As I begin to wind down on this project and look to the future, possible future work--continued work with adult or nontraditional students making the transition to academic literacy or, perhaps, with undergraduates making the opposite transition, from school to work.

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Course Descriptions

UNH's Technical WRiting:

ENGL 502 - Technical Writing
Credits: 4.00
A writing course focusing on effective communication of technical information. Writing of various technical documents, such as business letters, proposals, reports, brochures and web pages. Special emphasis on document design usability, visual rhetoric, and the use of technology in writing. Special fee. Writing intensive.

Thursday, October 8, 2009

More on Maureen's class

Today, brief meeting with Maureen; clarified intentions of talk to grad students:

She wants me to focus on two things:

1. Why did I choose to pursue this career? Where did my interest in comp/rhet come from?
2. A bit about my current work.

On number 1--formative experiences: Bonnie's "Approaches to Teaching Writing" class; Donald Murray and the idea of writing as thinking; my own experiences teaching writing at Iowa. This was a rich time of development in my professional life--that year or two at Iowa. Also, membership in the Iowa Portfolio Group and the trip to NCTE in fall 1996 and the UNH conference in fall 1996.

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

Writing Program Notes

Options:

1. Writing Minor (English Dept)
2. Major: Multimedia Writing & Technical Communication

ASU:

Digital Media/Rhetoric in English Department

ENH 364: Digital Media in the Humanities and Arts
TWC 301 General Principles of Multimedia Writing

Rhetoric:

ENG 472 Rhetorical Studies

AT THE POLYTECHNIC CAMPUS

Dept.: Multimedia Writing & Technical
Communication

The Bachelor of Arts in Multimedia Writing and Technical Communication is the only undergraduate technical communication degree program available in the state of Arizona. Multimedia writing is writing that incorporates graphics, sound, design, and media. Technical communication is applied workplace communication that makes technical information understandable and available to many audiences. In the multimedia writing and technical communication program, students learn how to produce, design, and manage information using both traditional and developing technologies.

Core

• TWC 301 General Principles of Multimedia
• TWC 401 Principles of Technical Communication
• TWC 411 Principles of Visual Communication
• TWC 421 Principles of Writing with Technology
• TWC 431 Principles of Technical Editing

Clemson:

Writing
A minor in writing requires 15 credits as follows:

Business and Technical Option-
AP EC 351 or G C 104, CP SC 120, ENGL 304 or 314, 490, 495.

Journalism Option-
ENGL 231, 333, 334, 335; one of the following: AP EC 351, CP SC 120, G C 104, ENGL 217, 304, 304, 312, 314, PHIL 102, SPCH 250, THRD 468, and any course approved by the Chair of the English Department.

Writing Pedagogy Option-
ENGL 312, 400, 401, 485; elective (three credits), any 300- or 400- level writing course offered by the Department of English.

Creative Writing Option-
Drama- THEA (ENGL) 347, 447 (six credits), ENGL 430, and one of the following: ENGL 312, 410, 411.
Fiction- ENGL 345, 445 (six credits) 432, and one of the following: ENGL 312, 418, 425, 426.
Poetry- ENGL 346, 446 (six credits), 431, and one of the following: ENGL 312, 413, 416, 417.

Friday, October 2, 2009

Writing Program Websites

We're redesigning our FYC website. Anyone have suggestions about good ones? (WPA-L, 9/25/09):

See Colorado State U: http://writing.colostate.edu/, for a rich site
with many resources, including a writing studio for teachers and
students to create/complete assignments, swap drafts, keep blogs and
more.

See U. of Alabama: http://www.as.ua.edu/fwp/welcome.html for a program
that outlines its outcomes, explains its courses and curriculum. This
is clear, easy to navigate.

UMass Amherst's program has a great site as well:
http://www.umass.edu/writingprogram/ with a good mix of news, course
info, resources.

I really like mine (!!):http://www.montclair.edu/writing/ at Montclair State University -- it hosts all things writing "Writing at Montclair" -- the first-year writing program, the Center for Writing Excellence, graduate programming in writing, the graduation requirement in writing. Teacher and student portals.

You might look through the list of program websites here:

http://wpacouncil.org/writingprograms/index.html


ENGL 350

Digital Rhetoric
Literacy and technology

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Commenting on student work

From WPA-L, fall 2009:

O'Neill and Fife's "Listening to Students: Contextualizing Response to
Student Writing" (Comp Studies 27.2) and "Moving Beyond the Written Comment:
Narrowing the Gap between Response Practice and Research" (CCC 48.2).

One of my favorite resources on response is Brian Huot's chapter "Reading Like a Teacher: Toward a Theory of Response" in his book (Re)articulation Writing Assessment for Teaching and Learning. It provides a snapshot of some of the big ideas in response since the '80s and creates a framework for thinking about response that is comprehensive but manageable. I read the chapter this summer with the new TAs at Florida State, and it generated rich conversation. I was especially impressed by how much they engaged with the text even though it's not a "how-to manual" for response.