NOtes from Earl's T/P Meeting

Key Docs for Earl:

1. Vita (annotated)
2. Personal Statement (“Where you get to expand on the CV…”)--length: "I would hate to give you a guideline...this is your portfolio, I should not be driving the length of your portfolio"

VITA:

Annotated Vita (teaching, service, scholarly activities—this is the order he said it)

Need to emphasize teaching and service—the CV needs to look different and not be a traditional CV

What courses have you taught and how often?

Did you teach them some place else?

I want him to be able to say “Michaud has taught a wide range of courses and had a great student response to all these courses…”

Service—committees I’ve served on, time I did this, work I did. “Dr. Michaud has done service in…”

He’s literally telling us what the sound of his 1.5 page letter to Ron will read like, starting with Teaching and then going on to Service.

Scholarly Activities

PERSONAL STATEMENT:

Teaching

I think I need to mention that if there is an “up and down” in my teaching evals, it’s because I have, since I arrived here, been continually teaching new classes and thus, the first time out, classes have not always gone “perfectly”—give him a reason to ignore the “bad” evaluations.

Am I highlight the use of technology enough in my teaching statement?

Earl makes it sound like—“Tell me in the statement what I should be paying attention to in terms of your student and peer evaluations.”

IN teaching section, need to highlight my collaborative writing/research projects with students, including Terri’s recent publication acceptance.

Service

Highlight the 2-3 service commitments that I took on and tell him why these were important and how I contributed. 

Advising counts as service (to the department)--retaining students

Scholarship

How'd you get into where you are?

What are you doing there?

Why is that important? How has that moved that area of scholarship/activity forward? The impact of my scholarship on the field...

Has the college offered you the opportunity and environment to stay engaged in your scholarly area and have you taken advantage of it?

---

Everything else in the binder is support material for what you've told me in the vita and personal statement.

You are tenured and promoted based on the argument you make about your teaching, service, and scholarly activities. Make the argument, provide the supporting material.

Return to make connections across teaching, service, research...

Should I highlight that my service and teaching have taken up most of my time? Or just leave that alone...

Need to tabulate teaching evals...

STEAM: an interesting resource for teaching

The Simple Team Experience Assessment Measure (STEAM) allows faculty to offer peer evaluations to student teams. A peer evaluation simply asks students how their peers performed on a team project. Peer evaluations, when properly implemented, allow an instructor both to assess how well individuals performed on a team as well as provide feedback to students so they become better at working on teams. For those unfamiliar with teams or peer evaluations a list of resources will be found later.

The Atlantic on Writing

Great Writing Comes Out of Great Ideas

We can certainly all agree that if you want students to learn to write well, you have to start by asking them to write. Looking broadly across the U.S., this will require a major change. The high-stakes tests that drive curricula in most states require very little writing, and that in turn has driven writing out of many classrooms. The National Assessment of Educational Progress reported earlier this month that in 2011, 40 to 41 percent of public school students at grades 8 and 12 were given less than a page of writing homework in a typical week. In fact some 14 percent of 12th graders reported being asked to do no writing for homework at all.

 In our own studies, we found that roughly 80 percent of the assignments students complete do not require them to compose text. Instead, they are asked to fill in blanks, copy notes, or choose among multiple-choice responses. Such activities may help them remember specific content, but they do not help them learn to do anything interesting--that is, to explore ideas that matter. And they certainly don't help them learn to write.

---

Many of the things that contributed to success in the schools we studied also seem to be present in New Dorp.

First, there was strong support and leadership from the school administration. Writing has to be high on a school-wide agenda.

Second, and closely related, teachers were involved in initiatives that went beyond their own classrooms. In our studies, the sources for these initiatives varied widely, from the National Writing Project, to collaborations with local universities, to state-sponsored professional development projects. The dedicated teacher standing in front of her own classroom, however stimulating and exciting, is not enough to transform achievement for a school as a whole.

Third, teachers became part of professional learning communities, working together, sharing ideas, gathering information, and changing curriculum and instruction in response to what they were learning. Such approaches build school-wide capacity by honoring the knowledge and experience that teachers bring with them. And they also recognize that there is no simple script, no silver bullet, that will improve student achievement. Instead, they require consistent emphases across the school, evolving over time in response to students' needs and accomplishments.

Fourth, there was a recognition that writing is tied closely to thinking about new material, and requires tools and strategies that can and should be taught. These may be as formulaic as the structure of a five-paragraph theme, or as open-ended as using sentence starters (because, although, if) to build arguments. They may include turn-taking cues to draw readers into productive discussion ("I agree/disagree...because," "I have something to add"). The point is that these are tools, not ends in themselves. Once students have learned to use them, instruction can focus elsewhere.

Finally -- and this is where I think Peg Tyre's article may lead us somewhat astray -- the most effective writing programs are able to embed what is required by high stakes tests and then move beyond to a much richer vision of curriculum and instruction. This is necessary whether the tests are those currently in place in most states, or the new ones being developed for the Common Core. Argument and exposition are important skills, but they build upon and incorporate the richness of the narratives that give most children their first opportunities to write (and talk) at length.

Easy Example on truth, Knowledge, discourse

Wikipedia Policies Limit Editing Haymarket Bombing