Showing posts with label Faculty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Faculty. Show all posts

Friday, April 17, 2015

Re: Your Recent Email to Your Professor

Re: Your Recent Email to Your Professor

April 16, 2015 
Dear College Student,
If your professor has sent you a link to this page, two things are likely true. First, you probably sent an email that does not represent you in a way you would like to be represented. Second, while others might have scolded you, mocked you or despaired over the future of the planet because of your email, you sent it to someone who wants to help you represent yourself better.
In part, because only a click or swipe or two separate emails from Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and texting, the lines between professional emails and more informal modes of writing have become blurred, and many students find the conventions of professional emails murky. We think we can help sort things out.
In the age of social media, many students approach emailing similar to texting and other forms of digital communication, where the crucial conventions are brevity and informality. But most college teachers consider emails closer to letters than to text messages. This style of writing calls for more formality, more thoroughness and more faithful adherence (sometimes bordering on religious adherence) to the conventions of Edited Standard Written English -- that is, spelling, punctuation, capitalization and syntax.
These different ways of writing are just that -- different ways of writing. The letter approach to emails is not always and forever better (or worse) than the texting approach. Knowing how and when to use one or the other -- based on why you are writing and whom you are writing to -- makes all the difference. So, if you use emojis, acronyms, abbreviations, etc., when texting your friends, you are actually demonstrating legitimate, useful writing skills. But you aren’t if you do the same thing when emailing professors who view emails as letters.
Effective writing requires shaping your words according to your audience, purpose and genre (or type of writing, e.g., an academic email). Together these are sometimes called the rhetorical situation. Some of the key conventions for the rhetorical situation of emailing a professor are as follows:
1. Use a clear subject line. The subject “Rhetorical Analysis Essay” would work a bit better than “heeeeelp!” (and much better than the unforgivable blank subject line).
2. Use a salutation and signature. Instead of jumping right into your message or saying “hey,” begin with a greeting like “Hello” or “Good afternoon,” and then address your professor by appropriate title and last name, such as “Prof. Xavier” or “Dr. Octavius.” (Though this can be tricky, depending on your teacher’s gender, rank and level of education, “Professor” is usually a safe bet for addressing a college teacher.) Similarly, instead of concluding with “Sent from my iPhone” or nothing at all, include a signature, such as “Best” or “Sincerely,” followed by your name.
3. Use standard punctuation, capitalization, spelling and grammar. Instead of writing “idk what 2 rite about in my paper can you help??” try something more like, “I am writing to ask about the topics you suggested in class yesterday.”
4. Do your part in solving what you need to solve. If you email to ask something you could look up yourself, you risk presenting yourself as less resourceful than you ought to be. But if you mention that you’ve already checked the syllabus, asked classmates and looked through old emails from the professor, then you present yourself as responsible and taking initiative. So, instead of asking, “What’s our homework for tonight?” you might write, “I looked through the syllabus and course website for this weekend’s assigned homework, but unfortunately I am unable to locate it.”
5. Be aware of concerns about entitlement. Rightly or wrongly, many professors feel that students “these days” have too strong a sense of entitlement. If you appear to demand help, shrug off absences or assume late work will be accepted without penalty because you have a good reason, your professors may see you as irresponsible or presumptuous. Even if it is true that “the printer wasn’t printing” and you “really need an A in this class,” your email will be more effective if you to take responsibility: “I didn’t plan ahead well enough, and I accept whatever policies you have for late work.”
6. Add a touch of humanity. Some of the most effective emails are not strictly business -- not strictly about the syllabus, the grade, the absence or the assignment. While avoiding obvious flattery, you might comment on something said in class, share information regarding an event the professor might want to know about or pass on an article from your news feed that is relevant to the course. These sorts of flourishes, woven in gracefully, put a relational touch to the email, recognizing that professors are not just point keepers but people.
We hope that these rules (or these and these) help you understand what most professors want or expect from academic emails. Which brings us back to the larger point: writing effectively does not simply mean following all the rules. Writing effectively means writing as an act of human communication -- shaping your words in light of whom you are writing to and why.
Of course, you won’t actually secure the future of the planet by writing emails with a subject line and some punctuation. But you will help your professors worry about it just a little less.
With wishes for all the best emails in the future,
PTC and CHM

Saturday, February 2, 2013

The More Things Change (I)

It is important that each member of the faculty, not the college alone but of the University as a whole, understand that he shares responsibility for the success of the student in acquiring an ability to express himself orally and to write with clarity and effectiveness. For whatever reason, young people entering college in these days are handicapped by lack of background; background that in the past was obtained through reading. Currently, most young people, unless they make an effort, acquire their background from the radio and the so-called "funny books", a combination which makes a far from dependable foundation for college work.

excerpted from the UNH "Annual Report of the College of Liberal Arts," 1946-47

Saturday, January 19, 2013

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Notes During Chris' 2013 Talk

The problem is that we are fixing the problem after the fact...faculty spend years assigning and grading writing, having been given very little instruction, if any, in this. Where do they look for models--they look to what they experienced. Was what they experienced pedagogically effective? Maybe.

So, we are trying to change someone's practice...not give them a practice. Much easier to give them this stuff when they are just starting out. Much less to let go of.

What is the process of change? Letting go...? We spend a good deal of time and energy trying to let people to let go of things...then we can give them something new or to replace that thing.

Research on how long people can listen to a lecture?

---

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Summer Planning

Readings

Presentation 1: Writing Before College (Graham)
Presentation 2: A Summary of Four Longitudinal Studies on Writing Development During
Presentation 3: Error in College Writing (Lunsford/Lunsford)
College Years (Sommers/Saltz, Haswell, Curtis/Herrington, Stanford Study of Writing)
Presentation 4: What We Know About Plagiarism (Defining and Avoiding Plagiarism: The WPA Statement on Best Practices)
Presentation 5:

In Hesse’s section “On Academic Writing and Discourse Communities: A Primer” Hesse tells the story of the increasing specialization of the academy and the implications of this process for discourse. He argues that, whereas, once, the academy could be defined as a single discourse community with shared conventions for communication, since the latter part of the 19th century, colleges and universities have been comprised of multiple discourse communities, each of which have developed their own epistemologies and genres and conventions for communication.

Hesse identifies and challenges a number of commonly held assumptions:

Colleges and universities form a single coherent discourse community with conventions of communication that span all communities within the larger community.

Generalized writing courses, taught by those outside of specialized academic discourse communities, can prepare students to communicate effectively in such communities.

Truth or knowledge are discovered outside of or apart from rhetoric (writing is a matter of conveying content or that which has already been discovered)

What interests/suprises you about Hesse’s discussion of academic discourse communities and their conventions for communication and/or the way in which students learn to communicate in academic discourse communities? What questions does this passage raise for you? How can you connect it with your experience as a teacher, student, or scholar?

Bb: Primary Posts and Secondary posts
Blog


Morning Afternoon HW:
Day 1 Getting to know Each Other/Presentation 1: Writng Before College Reading: Hesse (1-6) & Bb Discussion Board Post Read “Making Writing Assignments, Especially Formal Ones” (15-17); Bb: Describe/brainstorm an assignment you have already taught and would like to revisit or one you would like to teach.
Day 2 Presentation 2: Longitudinal Studies on Writing Development During the College Years;

Sunday, April 10, 2011

Linguistic abilities and challenging assignments

students have been shown to regress in writing performance at the level of sentence grammar when first attempting more complex cognitive and rhetorical tasks (Has well, 1991; Kitzhaber, 1963), making a neat, linear progression of linguis tic skills unlikely. Rather, writers' growth in linguistic abilities is likely to resemble a spiraling process that allows for regression and plateaus in learning as well^as forward progress (Haswell, 1991). (Beaufort, WRW, p. 139)

Friday, April 8, 2011

Importance of Genre and Discourse Community Knowledge

All faculties can benefit from being grounded in the research on transfer of learning and in genre and discourse community theories, the two most important organizing frameworks for understanding writing in social contexts. (Beaufort, College Writing and Beyond, p. 150)

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Resources on Disciplinary Writing

Resources on Disciplinary Writing

http://wac.colostate.edu/bib/index.cfm?categoryid=8

Overviews:

Bazerman, C. (1981). "What Written Knowledge Does: Three Examples of Academic Discourse." Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11: 361-87.
Bazerman, C. & J. Paradis (eds.) 1991. Textual Dynamics of the Professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Joliffe, D. (ed.) 1988. Writing in Academic Disciplines ( = Advances in Writing Research 2). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Myers, G. (1990). Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Myers, G. 1985. The Social Construction of Two Biologists' Proposals". Written Communication 2: 219-245.

MacDonald S.P. (1994). Professional Academic Writing in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Carbondale and Edwardsville: SIUP Press.

Faigley and Hansen, K. 1985. Learning to Write in the Social Sciences." CCC 36:140-49.

Vande Kopple, W. 1992. "Noun Phrases and the Style of Scientific Discourse." In S.P. Witte, N. Nakadate and R.D. Cherry (eds.), A Rhetoric of Doing: Essays on written discourse in the honor of James Kinneavy. Carbondale, IL: SIUP Press.


Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Summer Seminar Schedule

Morning:

10-10:30am: Writing time...one-pager on the reading (perhaps posted to Bb). What struck you, what moved you, what surprised you, what bothered you, what intrigued you?
10:30-11am: Small Groups, share
11-12am: Large Group, share

12-1pm: Lunch

Afternoon:

1-1:30: Reading
1:


Syllabus

Day 1: CWB, Ch. 1
Day 2: CWB, Ch. 2
Day 3: CWB, Ch. 3/4
Day 4: CWB, Ch. 5
Day 5: CWB, Ch. 6/Epilogue

Lindemann on teaching writing

Start the week off with a PPT of my own (or Steve Graham's)--big picture about writing

Bazerman, C. (1981). "What Written Knowledge Does: Three Examples of Academic Discourse." Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11: 361-87.
Swales/Johns (WAW)
Lunsford/Lunsford (error)
Sommers/Saltz
Rose on blockers
Moore Howard on Plagiarism

Perhaps a time for faculty to sort of hunt, read--articles, journals, books, chapters on writing in their own discipline--helping them become resourceful about how to teach writing in their discipline and what makes their discipline unique.

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

My reading list for my dream faculty writing class

It has to begin with Gee, "Literacy, Discourse, and Linguistics: Introduction." This has to be the first reading...all else can grow from there...

Friday, April 30, 2010

Faculty Teaching Writing Across the Disciplines

While English and language arts teachers have a disciplinary advantage in understanding and applying writing process principles, teachers in other disciplines have more problems. Their impulse is to use the model they remember form their own high school or undergraduate schooling rather than the process(es) they engage in as publishing professionals. Typically, they assign specific topics, providing few if any directions on how to write the paper. They read and comment only on the final draft, using intermediate drafts (if any) to ensure against plagiarism. Revision opportunities are few. Instructors in Writing Across the Curriculum faculty development programs often have to spend considerable time convincing participants of the inadequate pedagogy of this approach; even when teachers are unhappy with the papers written in this traditional manner, they are often reluctant to change--usually on the grounds that responding to drafts is too time consuming. ("The Great Paradigm Shift," Bloom, p. 44).

And so, you ask, what are those "writing process principles" to which Bloom refers in that first sentence? Here they are:

1. Writing is an activity, an act composed of a variety of activities.

2. The activities in writing are typically recursive rather than linear.

3. Writing is, first and foremost, a social activity.

4. The act of writing can be a means of learning and discovery.

5. Experienced writers are often aware of audience, purpose, and context.

6. Experienced writers spend considerable time on invention and revision.

7. Effective writing instruction allows students to practice these activities.

8. Such instruction includes ample opportunities for peer review.

9. Effective instructors grade student work not only on the finished product but on the efforts involved in the writing process.

10. Successful composition instruction entails finding appropriate occasions to intervene in each student's writing process. (Olson, qtd. in Bloom, p 33)