Showing posts with label Digital. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Digital. Show all posts

Sunday, August 23, 2015

Free and Easy: A Rubric for Evaluating Everyday Technology

Free and Easy: A Rubric for Evaluating Everyday Technology

Before a recent school year, one of my oldest friends—who now teaches special education courses at a middle school outside of Detroit—shared his excitement of being granted a SMART Board interactive whiteboard in his classroom. The SMART board allows users to write in “digital ink,” mark-up electronic texts (such as Word documents and websites), and save the results for future reference or sharing. The company who produces the boards boasts claims of students’ increased engagement and motivation as a result of using the product ("SMART Technologies"), which undoubtedly translates into why educators like my friend and his school district were so enthusiastic to incorporate them into their classrooms.

 Though my friend had every reason to be excited (he’s an excellent teacher in one of the most underappreciated divisions of education) his news was barely off his lips before I began my protestation against SMART Boards. I provided every counter-argument I could imagine: SMART Boards cost more money than most school districts are willing to spend. They can be a teacher-driven technology, often too protected to be widely used by students in a consistently democratic fashion. They, like most new technology, may cause immediate excitement, but once the novelty wears off they’re likely to be used as glorified dry erase boards. As I continued, though, I realized the futility of my arguments; I realized, in fact, that I didn’t have any legitimate reason to offer why this technology couldn’t be used smartly and effectively in the classroom. Of course, there has been considerable research and discussion into the value (or not) of these boards (such as Stephanie McCrummen’s piece in a 2010 Washington Post article), but my kneejerk reaction came from one small detail my fellow teacher mentioned that is likely repeated dozens—if not hundreds—of times in writing classrooms across the country each year: through no fault of his own, he had no idea how he was going to use the technology to enhance his classroom. This small detail, it turns out, is not so small.

When Shift Happens: Teaching Adaptive, Reflective, and Confident Writers

When Shift Happens: Teaching Adaptive, Reflective, and Confident Writers

Did You Know? Shift Happens, 2014 remix


Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Archiving the Literacy Narratives of Our Times

Archiving the Literacy Narratives of Our Times

An Interview with Dr. Cynthia Selfe and Dr. H. Lewis Ulman

By Megan Adams, Bowling Green State University

Sunday, February 24, 2013

On Digital Literacy Narratives

Issue of Computers and Composition online that has a lot on digital literacy narratives.

Digital Storytelling in the Composition Classroom: Addressing the Challenges by Ghanashyam Sharma

Archiving the Literacy Narratives of Our TimesAn Interview with Dr. Cynthia Selfe and Dr. H. Lewis Ulman By Megan Adams, Bowling Green State University

Writing Commons

Welcome to Writing Commons, the open-education home for writers. Our primary goal is to provide the resources college students need to improve their writing, research, and critical thinking. We believe learning materials should be free for all students and teachers.

Thursday, June 16, 2011

Projects, ideas, etc.

Mark Bittman's Food blog on the NYTimes.

The True Cost of Tomatoes (Bittman)

Here's the passage that caught my eye:

Most of us eat or buy industrially produced tomatoes, and it doesn’t seem too much to ask that the people who pick them for us be treated a little more fairly. Speak to your supermarket manager or write to the head of the chain you patronize (the easiest way to do this is to visit this page on the CIW site). Supermarkets, I expect, are as susceptible to public pressure as fast-food chains.

There are few places in the country where migrant and immigrant farmworkers are treated well; in Immokalee, at least, they’re being treated better. Bit by bit.

This is a case study...the course could be organized around case studies with digital literacy projects in response to the studies....

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Resources

The Social Documentary (Radio, Television, Film 345)


Barnouw, Erik. (1993). "Documentary: A History of the Non-Fiction Film, 2nd ed." New York: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, Jack C. (1989). "The Documentary Idea: A Critical History of English-language Documentary Film and Video." Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Nichols, Bill. (1991). "Representing Reality." Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.

M. Renov (Ed.), Theorizing Documentary. New York: Routledge.

Barry Keith Grant and Jeannette Sloniowski (Eds.)., "Documenting the Documentary: Close Readings of Documentary Film and Video." Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.

Readings:

Nichols, "How Do Documentaries Differ from Other Types of Film"
Nichols, "What Types of Documentary Are There"
Eitzen, "When Is a Documentary?: Documentary as a Mode of Reception"
Monaco, "The Language of Film: Signs and Syntax"

Monday, February 28, 2011

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Multimodal Reading List

Assessment:

The New Work of Assessment: Evaluating Multimodal Compositions. Computers and Composition, Spring 2010 Elizabeth A. Murray & Hailey A. Sheets (Ball State University)
Nicole A. Williams (Virginia Tech)

The Multiple Media of Texts: How Onscreen and Paper Texts Incorporate Words, Images, and Other Media" By Anne Francis Wysocki in What Writing Does and How It Does It (Bazerman/Prior)

Borton, Sonya, and Brian Huot. "Responding and Assessing." Multimodal Composition: Resources for Teachers. Ed. Cynthia L. Selfe. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton, 2007. 99-111.

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Friday, October 2, 2009

ENGL 350

Digital Rhetoric
Literacy and technology